giving up / the whorehouse
by jebni on March 5, 2006
Do you ever hack away at a project endlessly, letting it absorb all your mental and emotional energy, and yet fail to grasp the key that will let you unlock its heart? Sometimes you just have to give up. Which is what I’m doing.
I’ve been trying to write an article about Cronulla, racialisation and the different ethico-political conceptions of the world that such situations demonstrate, but unfortunately I don’t have an adequate ethico-political conception of the world of “my own” to offer. (I’ll possibly have something in a year, when I’m further into my thesis.) Neither do I have anything much more than a descriptive account of how nationalism is currently working in this country, when what I really need is an idea of what’s going on, which I take to be somewhat different. So I’m tossing in the towel.
I’ll disclose a little of where I was heading, though: when apprehending traumatic events, it’s useful go back to Walter Benjamin’s sense of the historical materialist’s mission that he outlines in the old “Theses on the Philosophy of History”, and see it as not some programme for an abstract “intellectual”, but as something everyday that people do. Of course (and I rarely see this discussed), Benjamin’s language can get somewhat uh, problematic:
The historical materialist leaves it to other to be drained by the whore called ‘Once upon a time’ in historicism’s bordello. He remains in control of his powers, man enough to blast open the continuum of history. [Benjamin 1992: 254]
Oooookay. I used to think one could simply set aside the dodgy trappings in which these kinds of allusive aphorisms are wrapped, but while there’s something undoubtedly very valuable in Benjamin’s conception of time and the event, it’s nontheless informed by a kind of masculinist and heroic fantasy of the subject that needs inverting.
[ tags: historical-materialism, marxism, walter-benjamin ]
3 comments
A ‘kind of’ masculinist and heroic fantasy?!!!
Are you ‘man enough’ to blast open the continuum of history jebni? Well, are ya?
Tee hee.
What do you mean by inverting?
by MC on 7 March 2006 at 11:23 pm. #
I remember reading that and rereading that, wondering if there was maybe a typo or a problem with the reprint. Fantasy is right. Oh, Walter, were you man enough? Somehow I don’t think so.
by az on 9 March 2006 at 3:50 am. #
Az, there really is one incredibly awful error in one edition of Illuminations, though. Here’s what I had to say about it — pass it on!
Please note that the typesetting of “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” in the 1973 Fontana edition of Benjamin’s Illuminations contains a grievous error. Instead of being “completely useless for the purposes of Fascism,” and “useful for the formulation of revolutionary demands” [Benjamin 1970b: 220], this particular edition figures Benjamin’s theses as “completely useless for the formulation of revolutionary demands”, and thus completely counter to his meaning. Given that earlier, expurgated versions of “The Work of Art…” have already lead some commentators to completely misread Benjamin on the loss of the aura, please pass on this warning in any future references to the essay.
by jebni on 9 March 2006 at 11:22 am. #